• Home
  • 4 Things about Rwanda 1994
  • Data on Violence
  • Data Animations
  • Troop movements
  • BBC Documentary
  • Subsidiary Rwanda Data
  • Post-Violence Transitional (In)Justice
  • Writings
  • Videos
  • Photos
  • Presentations
  • Project Staff
  • Rwanda?!
  • Links
  • Readings
  • GenoBlog
GenoDynamics

Rwandan Weekend Reading: 

10/24/2014

0 Comments

 
Amnesty International — Rwanda: Safer to Stay Silent: The Chilling Effect of Rwanda’s Laws on ‘Genocide Ideology’ and ‘Sectarianism’ (2010)

From the Report:

Following six years of extensive reforms to the conventional justice system, the Rwandan government announced a review of the “genocide ideology” law in April 2010. Amnesty International welcomes this government initiative. This report identifies Amnesty International’s concerns about the current legislation and its application in light of the Rwandan government’s review process.

Prohibiting hate speech is a legitimate aim, but the Rwandan government’s approach violates international human rights law. Rwanda’s vague and sweeping laws against “genocide ideology” and “divisionism” under “sectarianism” laws criminalize speech protected by international conventions and contravene Rwanda’s regional and international human rights obligations and commitments to freedom of expression. The vague wording of the laws is deliberately exploited to violate human rights.

Prosecutions for “genocide ideology” and so-called “genocide ideology-related” offences were brought even before the law defining this offence was promulgated. People continue to be prosecuted for “divisionism”, under “sectarianism” laws, even though “divisionism” is not defined in law. Rwandans, including judges, lawyers and human rights defenders, expressed confusion about what behaviour these laws criminalize.

These broad and ill-defined laws have created a vague legal framework which is misused to criminalize criticism of the government and legitimate dissent. This has included suppressing calls for the prosecution of war crimes committed by the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF). In the run-up to the 2010 elections, legitimate political dissent was conflated with “genocide ideology”, compromising the freedom of expression and association of opposition politicians, human rights defenders and journalists critical of the government. 
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Prof. Christian Davenport (University of Michigan), Prof. Allan Stam (University of Virginia) and guests will provide information about Rwandan political violence and mass political violence more generally.

    Archives

    October 2014

    Categories

    All
    Civil Liberties
    Data
    Evidence
    Political Violence
    Rwanda

    RSS Feed


Picture